Talk:Niladic function: Difference between revisions

From APL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
m (Text replacement - "</source>" to "</syntaxhighlight>")
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''A niladic function is the only possible named entity with this behaviour:'' no, also properties. [[User:Adám Brudzewsky|Adám Brudzewsky]] ([[User talk:Adám Brudzewsky|talk]]) 11:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
''A niladic function is the only possible named entity with this behaviour:'' no, also properties. [[User:Adám Brudzewsky|Adám Brudzewsky]] ([[User talk:Adám Brudzewsky|talk]]) 11:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC)


Hmm, do those actually count? You can't refer to them with a single name: you have to write <source lang=apl inline>obj.prop</source> (unless I'm mistaken). Probably worth mentioning as a similar construct, but I'm not so sure the statement is wrong. --[[User:Marshall|Marshall]] ([[User talk:Marshall|talk]]) 09:49, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Hmm, do those actually count? You can't refer to them with a single name: you have to write <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>obj.prop</syntaxhighlight> (unless I'm mistaken). Probably worth mentioning as a similar construct, but I'm not so sure the statement is wrong. --[[User:Marshall|Marshall]] ([[User talk:Marshall|talk]]) 09:49, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 10:47, 11 September 2022

A niladic function is the only possible named entity with this behaviour: no, also properties. Adám Brudzewsky (talk) 11:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Hmm, do those actually count? You can't refer to them with a single name: you have to write obj.prop (unless I'm mistaken). Probably worth mentioning as a similar construct, but I'm not so sure the statement is wrong. --Marshall (talk) 09:49, 16 March 2020 (UTC)